Tuesday, May 08, 2012

The IMF and Hubbert




The IMF just published a working paper with an eye-catching title The Future of Oil: Geology versus Technology. To my knowledge, this is is the first time a peak oil scenario, in the form of a Hubbert Linearization, is explicitly  injected into a econometric model. Based on the work of Hubbert, Deffeyes and Campbell, available supply is modeled by a Hubbert curve plus a marginal supply component sensitive to prices. 

The Hubbert Linearization is a way to plot the annual production as a fraction of a cumulative production versus the cumulative production. If production follows a Logistic curve (aka Hubbert curve) then a linear relation can be observed

\[\frac{q_t}{Q_t}= \alpha_s − \beta Q_t\]

where \(\alpha_s\) and \(\beta=\alpha_s/URR\) are related to the logistic growth rate and the Ultimate Recoverable Resource respectively.  Figure 4 from the IMF paper shows the result of the Hubbert linearization following Deffeyes 2005 projection with an URR at 2.013 Trillion barrels.
Figure 1. Oil Production Forecasts in the Deffeyes (2005) Model (Q in gigabarrels, q in
gigabarrels p.a.). src: IMF, Figure 4.

The IMF correctly observes that total supply has been diverging from a straight line since 2004. There is some confusion on what definition exactly they are using for World supply. This is tricky of course because only conventional oil could possibly follow a geological peak whereas biofuels and NGL would follow different constraints. The IMF quotes the work of Deffeyes, however, Deffeyes was originally only looking at conventional crude oil. On the other side of the equation, demand is met by the total volume of liquid fuel available regardless of its origin. It is said that the model results are based on the IEA data for crude oil, condensates plus Natural Gas Liquids (NGL). It is a little bit strange because the IEA is publishing an estimate for World supply only for All liquids at least in the Oil Market Reports. Total supply usually includes Natural Gas Liquids, syncrude from tar sands, heavy oil such as raw bitumen, biofuels, refinery processing gains, etc.. The EIA database is giving  86.94 Mb/d for 2011 or 31.73 Giga barrels (see Figure 2 below). Considering only crude oil, condensates and NGL, we get 30.13 Gb/d for 2011. Looking at their forecast (Figure 10 page 30), the 2011 data point is clearly above 31 Gb so it seems to indicate they are considering All liquids.
Figure 2. World Production (C+C= crude oil and lease condensates)

Since 2004, it is clear that supply growth is coming from unconventional sources and NGL while conventional oil production is basically flat.

Figure 3. Supply growth per category (100= Jan 2001).
Looking at the residuals between the Hubbert Linearization and supply on Figure 1, there is a correlation between those residuals and real prices (excluding oil price shocks from the 70s).


It then follows that the deviation from the Hubbert line is interpreted as an increase in marginal supply due to high prices

$$\frac{q_t}{Q_t}= \alpha_s − \beta_1 Q_t+\beta_2 p_t +\beta_3 \frac{1}{3}\sum_{k=4}^6 p_{t-k}$$

more to come.

4 comments:

  1. It is easy to find the information about peak oil, but what makes me uneasy in recent days is the article Which Resource Will Run Out First? Its author claims that our next problem will not be oil deficiency but lack of minerals used in hi-tech industries. I do not know what to think about it. Do you happened to know any report that discusses this issue?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good. It is important to recognise that price generates supply just as it moderates demand. But we still see underlying crude oil and condensate supply declining faster than new capacity of all liquid types and this will lead to price pressures and the rebalancing of demand in countries with large discretionary consumption in the OECD

    ReplyDelete
  3. David L. Hagen1:03 PM

    Khebab
    See the discussion by Benes et al. at the bottom of Page 5.
    Look forward to your further analyses.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Katsushiro is the only samurai at Kanna when the capital arrives with a blistering blast that he is able to deflect with his kitanna. This shows how far Katsushiro had gone as a warrior from the pathetic swordsmen he was at the start of the series. Katsushiro and the villagers meet the brainless bandits (since the had their souls replica wathces removed by Ukyo), as Kambei, Kikuchiyo and Shichiroji approach from the rear. All four have their swords drawn as the continue to deflect blasts as well as dice bandits. Heihachi joins Katsushiro as the rest of the team rides upon prada handbags Ukyo's mighty cannon blast and land on the deck of the capital.

    ReplyDelete